Is tree impact uncertainty putting your Shropshire layout at risk?
We provide clear, defensible Arboricultural Impact Assessments that explain how retained trees interact with layouts, access and foundations so planners and designers can move forward with confidence.
Calls answered in 2 rings, emails replied to within the hour.
Clear guidance before you commit.
Working in partnership with clients to ensure planning approval first time
Industry Leading Standard
We stay with you from first call through to submission.
If your proposal cannot avoid tree influence, Shropshire planners will expect a formal Arboricultural Impact Assessment to validate the application.
If you’re a homeowner, you may need an AIA when an extension, driveway or garage sits close to retained trees or their roots.
If you’re a developer, an AIA is typically required where layouts, access routes, drainage or foundation designs interact with existing trees shown on a BS 5837 tree survey.
Within Shropshire, Arboricultural Impact Assessments are frequently required where:
Residential development in Shrewsbury, Oswestry and Bridgnorth encroaches on mature garden or boundary trees
Edge-of-village schemes require new access tracks or services to cross retained tree groups
Brownfield regeneration sites include long-established tree belts shaping site constraints
Rural plots near market towns introduce foundations or drainage within root protection zones
Planning decisions focus on the compatibility between proposed layouts and the long-term health of retained trees.
Our Arboricultural Impact Assessments support projects in Telford, Shrewsbury and the wider Shropshire area, where layouts, access and retained trees interact.
Shropshire planning authorities request Arboricultural Impact Assessments where development proposals interact directly with retained trees. LPAs use AIAs to test whether layouts, access routes, drainage strategies and foundation designs respond realistically to canopy spread and root protection areas, in line with BS 5837 and the National Planning Policy Framework. Where impacts are unclear or poorly justified, applications are commonly delayed, conditioned or returned for redesign.
Our AIAs in Shropshire are commercially aware, proportionate and planning-led, designed to support real-world construction sequencing, access logistics and foundation strategy without unnecessary escalation.
We resolve tree-related planning risk across Shropshire through:
Defensible impact assessment aligned to BS 5837
Proportionate mitigation and construction guidance
Clear layout compatibility testing for planners
Integrated reporting with TPPs, drainage or ecology where required
Your application is strengthened with evidence that planners trust.
Assessment of site layout alongside tree survey data.
Root protection areas, canopy spread, access routes and construction zones are fully assessed.
Protection, construction methods and layout refinements defined.
Integrated with Tree Protection Plans (TPPs), drainage design or ecological surveys.
Ready to confirm whether your Shropshire project needs an AIA?
Send us your site details and we’ll give you a clear, proportionate route forward.
Arboricultural Impact Assessments (AIAs) are important in Shropshire due to the county’s extensive rural landscape, mature tree cover, and frequent presence of hedgerows and woodland edges. An AIA ensures that development proposals properly account for these features, helping to balance site viability with the protection of valuable trees and landscape character.
An AIA is typically requested when trees are present within or adjacent to a development site and could be affected by construction. In Shropshire, this often applies to both rural and edge of settlement developments where trees form part of the wider landscape or ecological network.
An AIA considers all trees that could be influenced by development, including individual trees, groups, hedgerows, and woodland areas. In Shropshire, hedgerows can be particularly important as they often contribute to biodiversity, boundary definition, and planning considerations.
Where development is proposed near woodland or established tree groups, the AIA will assess potential impacts such as shading, root disturbance, and construction pressure. In Shropshire, this is especially relevant on sites bordering agricultural land or rural estates, where tree belts are common.
Yes. A well prepared AIA provides clear evidence that tree related constraints have been identified and addressed. In Shropshire, this can reduce objections from planning officers, consultees, or local stakeholders by demonstrating a considered and responsible approach to tree retention and protection.
BS5837 is the British Standard that guides how trees should be assessed in relation to construction. In Shropshire, AIAs are expected to follow this standard, ensuring consistency in how trees are categorised, how Root Protection Areas are calculated, and how impacts are assessed within planning submissions.
An AIA will assess how access points, driveways, and building footprints interact with existing trees. In Shropshire developments, this often results in design adjustments such as repositioning access routes or reducing hardstanding within sensitive root zones to allow for tree retention.
Mitigation measures may include protective fencing, changes to construction methods, or design alterations to avoid tree damage. In Shropshire, recommendations may also consider long term landscape integration, ensuring retained trees continue to contribute to the character of the site.
Local Planning Authorities across Shropshire will require an AIA where trees are a planning consideration. This includes Shropshire Council and Telford and Wrekin Council. Each authority sets its own validation requirements, so early engagement is recommended.
An AIA should be considered at the early design stage, once initial layout options are being explored. In Shropshire, early input helps ensure trees are integrated into the design rather than becoming a constraint later, reducing the risk of planning delays or costly redesign.
